손해배상(기)
1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.
A. Attached Form 1 Map 27, 23, 24, 25, 26, and 27, on the ground of 4,538 square meters of Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si.
Basic facts are those who own land in Kimpo-si E Forest E- 10,994 square meters (hereinafter referred to as a lot number) and the above ground housing, F, G, H, I, J, J, K, L, M, N, P, P, Q, and R, and operate S.
The defendant is a person who owns C, T, U, V, D, W, and X land in contact with the plaintiff's above land.
In December 2016, the Defendant accumulated the same embankment (hereinafter “the instant embankment”) as that indicated in Section 1(a) of Order No. 1 for Police Officers.
After the Defendant constructed the instant embankment, it was difficult for the Plaintiff to flow out into the lower land in the vicinity of the Plaintiff’s land located in the notified forest, etc., and it was turned out to the Plaintiff’s land.
On or after the early December 2016, the king tree was dead by the plaintiff's 2gs and king king tree (hereinafter "the trees of this case") owned by the plaintiff, which was planted on the above land by ice ice ice.
[Ground for Recognition: Unsatisfy Facts, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3, 5, 6, 23
(3) Of the annexed drawings 2, the drainage pipe is located under the connected part of the road. ③ The natural drainage pipe exists on the boundary of the land C and D land owned by the Defendant (hereinafter “the instant drainage channel”) among the connected parts, and the same drawings 4 through 5 are located on the connected part of the land and D land.
The notification unit of the adjacent Y land was connected to the Z ditch located below the lower part of the instant drainage route and connected to the Z ditch, but the Defendant installed the instant embankment, thereby blocking natural inflows by blocking the drainage route of this case.
This is in violation of Article 221 (1) of the Civil Code, so the defendant can flow water.