If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

1. On August 6, 2014, at around 20:50, the Defendant: (a) caused the victim C (50 years of age) in front of the Cheongsong-gun, Cheongsong-gun, Cheongsong-gun; (b) caused the victim’s hump to the hump to the hump to the hump to the hump to the hump; and (c) caused the victim’s hump to the left-hand face to the hump to the hump to the hump to the hump to the hump; and (d)

2. On August 6, 2014, at around 21:50, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties by assaulting a police officer with respect to the mobilization of a report by assaulting him, such as satisfeing a batf, and satching a batf, on the ground that he demanded voluntary performance of duties by the Fabs affiliated with the Fab that he was dispatched after receiving the report of paragraph (1) within the residence of E located in Cheongju-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Cheongju-gun, Cheongju-gun, 2014.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement concerning C and G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of applicable Article on criminal facts, the choice of punishment, and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Selection of a fine for choosing a punishment (the fact that the person's fault is recognized and reflected, the victim C has agreed with it smoothly, and the crime of violating the Road Traffic Act has not been committed any other criminal record except for the case that has been punished twice by minor fines due to the violation of the Road Traffic Act);

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.