When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

1. From around 08:50 on December 30, 2013 to 09:20 on the same day, the Defendant interfered with the 30 minutes of the victim’s restaurant business by allowing the victim to return to the victim a large amount of 30 minutes of the disturbance, such as taking the victim’s desire to drink and drink with drinking alcohol, on the ground that the victim prevented himself/herself from drinking alcohol from drinking alcohol, etc. at the window of the victim’s hall operated by Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si.

2. On December 30, 2013, from around 13:50 to 14:00 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) took a disturbance, such as taking the victim’s talking with a large sound, on the ground that the victim reported the above behavior 112; and (b) obstructed the victim’s restaurant business in a large volume of ten minutes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of E;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;