A. The punishment sentenced by the lower court (four months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

B. The sentence imposed by the prosecutor by the court below is too uneasible and unreasonable.

2. The lower court sentenced the Defendant to four months of imprisonment, taking into account the circumstances favorable to the Defendant, favorable to the Defendant, and the sentencing guidelines recommended by the Sentencing Committee.

There is no circumstance in which the lower court’s determination of sentencing exceeded the reasonable bounds of its discretion in full view of the matters that are the conditions of sentencing, the applicable sentences, and the sentencing criteria, or it is recognized that maintaining the sentencing of the lower court is unreasonable.

In addition, considering the circumstances and results of the instant crime, Defendant’s age, character and behavior, environment, etc. after the instant crime, the sentence of the lower court is appropriate, and it is not deemed that it is too heavy or unreasonable.

Therefore, both prosecutor and defendant's assertion are without merit.

3. The appeal by the prosecutor and the defendant is without merit and all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act.