beta
(영문) 부산고등법원 2019.10.10 2018나55770

부당이득금

Text

1. The plaintiff (Counterclaim defendant)'s appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant).

3. The first instance.

Reasons

1. Scope of the judgment of this court;

A. The plaintiff, as the principal lawsuit of this case, indicates the defendant's accompanying drawings on the defendant.

ㄱ. ㄴ. ㄷ. ㄹ. ㅁ. ㅊ. ㅋ. 부분을 배타적으로 점유하면서 사용, 수익하고 있음을 전제로 2014. 12. 4.부터 2017. 12. 31.까지 임료상당 부당이득금인 350,306,372원과 2018. 1. 1.부터 피고가 위 점유를 종료하는 날까지 월 10,154,065원의 비율에 의한 임료상당 부당이득금의 지급을 구하였다.

In addition, the Defendant indicated the Plaintiff’s accompanying drawings as to the Plaintiff as the counterclaim of this case.

9999,790 won per fee under the premise that the portion is exclusively occupied and used and taken profits from the exclusive possession, and that the Plaintiff sought reimbursement of unjust enrichment on the basis of the rate of KRW 51,396,462 per fee from December 4, 2014 to December 21, 2017, and KRW 1,489,790 per annum from January 1, 2018 to the end of the said possession.

B. The court of the first instance: (1) Indication of the attached drawings in the Plaintiff’s main office of this case

ㄷ. ㅋ. 부분에 관하여는 원고의 청구를 인용하고, 나머지 부분에 관하여는 원고의 청구를 기각하였고, ② 피고의 반소 청구를 인용하였다.

C. As to this, the Plaintiff’s claim of this case was indicated in the attached Form No. 1 to this court.

ㄱ. ㄷ. ㄹ. ㅁ. ㅋ. 부분을 배타적으로 점유하면서 사용, 수익하고 있음을 전제로 2014. 12. 4.부터 2017. 12. 31.까지 임료상당 부당이득금과 2018. 1. 1.부터 피고가 위 점유를 종료하는 날까지 임료상당 부당이득금의 지급을 구하는 것으로 청구취지를 감축하면서, 본소에 관한 원고 패소부분 중 별지 도면 표시

1. Adiv. 5. Parts 5. (v.) only appealed, and did not file an appeal against the instant counterclaim (see, e.g., a written application for correction of the purport of the claim and appeal filed on July 15, 2019), and ② the Defendant did not file an appeal.

Therefore, the subject of this Court's adjudication is indicated in the attached Form 1 among the part against the plaintiff in this case.