When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On November 8, 2015, at around 18:00, around 112, the Defendant expressed a desire to “I am h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers regarding the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of police statement protocol to E;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Determination on the application of sentencing guidelines for reasons (O) under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act for the order of provisional payment: Taking into account all circumstances, such as the fact that the case is an contingent crime under the influence of anO under the influence of no application, and the fact that the injury police officer does not heavy damage;