도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
On July 21, 2006, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of 3.5 million won for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the Suwon District Court on July 21, 2006, and was sentenced to a fine of 2.5 million won for the same crime in the same court on February 6, 2009, and the same criminal records are five times more.
On May 14, 2013, at around 06:08, the Defendant driven a B Sti-type car from the street above the original elementary school located in the direct control of Pyeongtaek-si in the front of the original elementary school located in Pyeongtaek-si, and from the street above the original red distance, while under the influence of alcohol 0.184% of the blood alcohol level without a driver’s license.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Report on the statement of the status of a drinking driver, and the report on the status of a drinking driver;
1. Registers of driver's licenses;
1. Previous convictions indicated in judgment: The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to criminal records and investigation reports;
1. Relevant provisions of Article 148-2 (1) 1, Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, subparagraph 1 of Article 152 and Article 43 of the Road Traffic Act concerning facts constituting an offense;
1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;
1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;
1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;
1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;
1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on Probation and Order to Attend Education is that the defendant committed the crime of this case, even though he had the history of drinking alcohol driving at multiple times, and the defendant was also under the high level of alcohol content of the blood alcohol of this case. However, although the defendant recognized the crime of this case, the defendant is against the recognition of the crime, the defendant is not driving under the influence of alcohol again, and there is no same criminal record beyond the fine, etc., the probation and order to attend a lecture shall be issued only once by taking account of various sentencing conditions indicated in the record, and probation and order to prevent recidivism.