beta
(영문) 제주지방법원 2014.09.26 2014고단991

위증

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 300,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On April 30, 2013, at the court of Incheon District Court No. 406 around 16:30, the Defendant appeared as a witness in a lawsuit demanding construction cost brought by the Defendant’s Dong C against D and E (the Incheon District Court 2012dan76453, hereinafter “instant civil lawsuit”), and testified as follows;

1. In fact, the defendant, while entering into a subcontract agreement with the KAF for the Chang Construction Project operated by C, received a written estimate of the amount of KRW 35.4 million from the KAF and gave rise to D. However, the defendant's attorney at the other party's attorney at the other party's inquiry, "I will not have received a written estimate of KRW 35.4 million from F in connection with the construction of the building of this case," with the other party's attorney at the other party's inquiry, "I will not have received any written estimate from FA or anywhere, and will have received any false statement contrary to memory."

2. In fact, the Defendant, along with D and E, entered into a new construction project with the Gyeonggi-gun G Ground Housing, etc. and invested money equivalent to KRW 120 million in the said project. However, the Defendant presented a false statement contrary to memory by the other party’s attorney’s reply to “I cannot be viewed as a partnership business relationship” with the other party’s attorney’s “I shall not be deemed to be a partnership business relationship, because the witness is in a partnership with Defendant D,” thereby making a false statement contrary to memory;

3. In fact, the Defendant, while managing the construction site as set forth in Paragraph 2, issued a false statement contrary to memory by responding to the other party’s attorney’s “a witness directly managing the Defendant’s passbook,” thereby raising perjury by making a false statement against memory, despite the fact that he managed the Defendant’s passbook under D and E’s name.”

4. In fact, the Defendant signed a contract for a construction project, other than the original construction subcontract written with C, but is also a witness or a legal representative of the other party.