If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

At around 02:20 on December 14, 2019, the Defendant received a request for returning home from D, a police officer of the Seodaemun Police Station C (a police officer of the Seodaemun Police Station) dispatched after receiving 112 report that “a brea female under the influence of alcohol assaults another woman,” and received a request for returning home from D on the part of the police officer.”

This dog, stove, stoves, and stoves with the desire of this dog, and assaulted D's chests at approximately 10 times due to both drinking, frying D's breasts, fry, and legs.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (to hear statements by a D police officer);

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of fines, and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The fact that it is not good that the crime was committed by assaulting a police officer in the course of performing official duties for the reason of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order, that there is only one time that the police officer’s desire to keep the disturbance and that the police officer was punished for violent crimes even after the arrest, and that the criminal defendant was punished for violent crimes. However, the defendant’s recognition of the crime of this case, and all other circumstances, including the defendant’s age, character and behavior, career, motive of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc., are considered to be considered to determine the