However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of a vehicle with a low-income bracket C.

On February 21, 2013, the Defendant driven the said car at a low speed on 00:35, and led to a three-lane road of the implied intersection, 168, Dong-dong 1, Seoul, Jung-gu, Seoul, to proceed at a low speed, depending on one-lane distance from the shooting distance in the Taeung-dong area.

At the time, since it is night and a lot of traffic vehicles, the defendant engaged in driving of the motor vehicle has a duty of care to take care of the front side well and to prevent accidents in advance by securing safety distance with the motor vehicle ahead.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and led the victim D(W, 54) who was driven by the victim D(W) who was driven by the victim D(W, 54) to the front end end end end end end end end end end end end end end end end end end end end end end end end end end end end end end end end end end end end end end end end end end end end end end end end end end end end end end end end end end end end end end end on the opposite part.

Ultimately, the Defendant, due to the above occupational negligence, attempted to escape from the victim H(27) without taking necessary measures, such as destroying the said car to the extent that the repair cost, such as exchanging the victim D with the climatic clif, and immediately stopping the said car to the extent that the 1,25,096 won is to be 1,225,00 won, and the repair cost, such as exchanging the clif, to the victim D with the clif for about two weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. Each written diagnosis;

1. Application of the written estimate for each motor vehicle;

1. Specific crimes as prescribed in the corresponding provisions of the Act regarding criminal facts.