When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

1. On October 14, 2016, around 12:35, the Defendant interfered with the business of the Defendant: (a) obstructed the Victim’s business by avoiding disturbance by force, and obstructing the Victim’s clothes by force, on the ground that, in front of the clothes of the Victim C’s operation in Ansan-si, the Defendant: (b) obstructed the Victim’s clothes, by using the clothes of the victim’s clothes installed therein, with his/her head, he/she was shakened in all directions; and (c) expanding the clothes of the booms of the booms of the booms of the brea-si

2. The Defendant damaged property at the above date, time, and at the above place, expanded a scam to the floor, thereby displaying a 20,000 won of the market price owned by the victim. The Defendant damaged its utility by putting a scam equivalent to 23,00 won of the market price, 23,000 won of the market price, 28,000 won of the market price, 28,000 won of the market price, and 1 head of the shoulder top of the 28,000 won of the market price, away from the floor.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business) and Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 37 (former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Code, Article 38 (1) 2 and Article 50 of the Criminal Code of Aggravation of Concurrent Crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 334(1) or more of the Criminal Procedure Act.