Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

Reasons

1. On September 25, 2015, with respect to an application case for indirect compulsory performance filed by the Defendant against the Plaintiff on September 23, 2015, the said court rendered a ruling on November 23, 2015, stating that “the Plaintiff was not subject to compulsory inspection of the Plaintiff’s articles of incorporation, ② the minutes of the ordinary shareholders’ meeting from 2009 accounts to 2013, ③ the audit report, ④ the operating report, ④ the specifications of allowance for bad debts, the specifications of appropriation for retirement benefits, sales cost, and the specifications of sales cost among the accompanying statements of the financial statements, and the respective inspection and copying (including consuls and computer USB, etc.) within the Plaintiff’s business hours, and the said court rendered a ruling on December 21, 2015, that the Plaintiff was not subject to indirect compulsory inspection of KRW 200,000 per day from the date following the said ruling to the expiration of the execution period, and that the Plaintiff was not subject to indirect compulsory inspection of the execution clause.”