2. The judgment of the court below takes into account the following factors: (a) the defendant divided his mistake into several parts; (b) agreed with the victims; (c) the self-denunciation of the victims; and (d) the sale of the vehicle in operation of the defendant sold the vehicle without a license; (b) while the defendant escaped without taking any measure, such as aiding and abetting the victims, even though he violated the signal without a license, causing an accident causing personal and material damage; (c) the degree of injury to the victim was inappropriate; (d) the defendant was punished for a crime of the same kind of crime in 2007; and (e) the crime of this case was committed during the period of repeated crime; and (e) the punishment of this case was committed during the period of repeated crime, including the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, circumstances after the crime, and circumstances after the crime, and all of the sentencing conditions

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.