beta
(영문) 창원지방법원 2017.11.03 2017고단3039

공무집행방해등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 28, 2017, the Defendant refused to leave, around 02:18, at the D main points in the operation of the Victim C (70 tax ) located in the Gu-si, Changwon-si on May 28, 2017, the Defendant: (a) brought about a serious threat that he/she did not drink in the past, and (b) threatened the Defendant with the desire to “Chewing, gree, and sick,” such as “abre” to the victim.

In spite of the victim's demand for the withdrawal on several occasions, the defendant did not comply with the request for withdrawal without justifiable reasons, such as leaving the scene beyond the chill and continuing to escape from disturbance.

2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties at the above date, time, and place of 112 and sent out to the police box F (49 years old) and F (31 years old) assigned to the police box of the Jindo Police Station E (31 years old) and G (31 years old). As such, the Defendant threatened F by hand with the Defendant’s hand and carried out F in the boat.

Defendant assaulted the above F and G to arrest a flagrant offender due to the suspicion of interference with the performance of official duties, such as cutting the F and G to his body.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

3. The Defendant, who violated the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act, was arrested in the act of committing the crime under suspicion of obstructing the performance of official duties, and was transferred to E-PP in Changwon-si, and on the same day to F and G around 02:38 of the same day.

Ep. Mai Doi Doi Doi Doih

Salky's Happa Happa

Lice, Chewing, etc., threaten as drinking, threaten an article, threaten snow as they are, threaten snow as they are, and spread water contained in the paper cups.

Defendant continued to provide the Inspector I with a bath theory, such as “I am this Chewing franchise. N. N. N. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L

As a result, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol for about one hour and 40 minutes, had a very rough and slickous speech and behavior at a public office.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to C, F, and G;

1. A report on investigation (a statement by a victim C telephone);

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to police boxes, video CDs;

1. Article 319 of the Criminal Act of this Act concerning criminal facts.