beta
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2014.05.02 2014노158

재물손괴등

Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. As to the issue of defamation among the facts charged in the instant case, the Defendant posted this case’s article on the Kafanon-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de

As to the damage of the facts charged in the instant case, the Defendant obtained consent from the victim and accompanied the cell phone of the victim.

Nevertheless, the court below found all of the facts charged guilty by misunderstanding the facts.

2. Determination

A. The evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below and the circumstances that can be recognized by the court below, i.e., (i) the sexual character, gender, permanent domicile, extension, physical size, weight, time and reason for divorce, cut off one room, which is personal information that can identify the maker in accordance with the contents of this case, correspond to the victim; (ii) the victim was engaged in the general affairs of the car page of this case; and (iii) the members were aware of the personal information of the victim because the victim was at least twice a month. < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 20124, Mar. 2, 2012>

4. 4. Around 10:46, the victim was published in the instant car page. At around 12:04, approximately 18 minutes after 18 minutes from the victim, the victim received e-mail attached to this case where the number of inquiries to the effect that the victim appears to have been confirmed as having been published about 5 minutes, and other members received e-mail attached to this case, and the victim called the Chairperson as soon as other members make the instant writing rapidly and by telephone to the Chairperson, and the defendant stated that the victim, who was the victim at the time of the investigation agency, tried to know of what others would be evaluated against the victim on the ground that the victim was not a man. < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 20190, Apr. 10, 2007>