2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. On April 1, 2002, the Plaintiff borrowed KRW 2 million from the Defendant, and on December 1, 2002, concluded an accord and satisfaction agreement between the Defendant and the Defendant to transfer the instant vehicle to the Defendant, instead of paying the said debt, and delivered the said vehicle to the Defendant.

Therefore, the Defendant seeks from the Plaintiff the acquisition of transfer registration procedure based on the above payment arrangement as to the instant automobile.

B. In full view of the purport of the entire pleadings in the statement No. 1 of the judgment of the court below, it is recognized that the mortgage was established on April 1, 2002 by the mortgagee, the mortgagee, the debtor, the plaintiff, and the bond value of the automobile of this case as KRW 2 million.

However, even if all the evidence submitted by the Plaintiff, including the witness C’s testimony, are added to the above facts, it is insufficient to recognize that the Plaintiff and the Defendant entered into an accord and satisfaction agreement as alleged by the Plaintiff, and there is no other evidence to

(B) The Plaintiff’s assertion is based on the Plaintiff’s assertion. The Plaintiff’s assertion on a different premise is without merit, and the Plaintiff’s assertion on a different premise is without merit. The Plaintiff’s assertion on a different premise is without merit. The Plaintiff’s assertion on a different premise is without merit.

2. The plaintiff's claim for conclusion is dismissed for reasons.