병역법위반
The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.
Punishment of the crime
The defendant is a person subject to a call for military force mobilization training.
On August 7, 2015, the Defendant received a notice of convening a call for military force mobilization training in the name of the head of the Gyeonggi-do Military Branch of Gyeonggi-do, which caused military forces mobilization training conducted by 28 association joint and several 2 units from September 14, 2015 to September 16, 2015 at the Defendant’s residence of Jung-gu Incheon, Jung-gu, 822 Dong 3004 around August 7, 2015, and did not enlist on the designated date without justifiable grounds.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;
1. Accusation against a person who violates the Military Service Act;
1. Application of C’s written laws and regulations
1. Article 90 of the relevant Act on criminal facts, Article 90 of the Military Service Act on the Selection of Punishment, and Selection of fines;
1. A fine not exceeding 500,000 won to be suspended;
1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) (100,000 won per day) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;
1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of not less than Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (i.e., grounds for non-compliance with a muster notice) of the suspended sentence;