The judgment below

Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment in light of the evidence duly admitted by the first instance court and the first instance court, the lower court was justifiable to have determined that the instant facts charged was guilty on the grounds stated in its reasoning. In so doing, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence in violation of logical and empirical rules, exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence,

In addition, in a written judgment, a judge’s signature and seal is affixed (Article 41 of the Criminal Procedure Act), but the signature and seal of the judge is not necessary to affix the copy of the judgment served on the defendant (see Supreme Court Decision 2007Do3060, Jun. 28, 2007). Therefore, inasmuch as there is an error of omission of the signature and seal of the judge in the first instance trial and the judgment of the court below on a different premise, the allegation of the grounds of appeal that there

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.