상해등
Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
On April 11, 2017, the Defendant: (a) committed assault, such as, on April 11, 2017, the victim C (n, 61 years of age) located in Seocheon-si B; (b) the victim C (n, 61 years of age); (c) the police officer G, who was dispatched after receiving 112 reports due to the assault, etc. of D, in order to listen to the damage from the reported person C; (d) the police officer of the F District Police Station of Seocheon-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, who was called for, in order to listen to the damage from the reported person C; and (e) pushed the above G by hand, and obstructed the police officer’s legitimate performance of official duties concerning the handling of the reported case.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Statement of the police statement against G or C;
1. 112 Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on reported details;
1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;
1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;
1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act / [Scope of Recommendation] There is no person [the person who has been subject to special sentencing] in the basic area (6 months to one year and six months) [the decision of sentence] [the defendant reflects his mistake, the fact that the police officer's exercise of force is relatively minor, the defendant has no punishment exceeding a fine, and the fact that there is no punishment exceeding a fine, etc., the nature of the crime is not good, such as the defendant's abusiveing the police officer and assaulting him, the fact that the damaged police officer is wanting to punish the defendant, the fact that the damaged police officer wanted to be punished by the defendant, and the fact that the defendant has the record of punishment for the crime related to violence, and the fact that there is a record of punishment for the crime related to violence, etc., shall be determined as the same sentence as the order in consideration of various sentencing conditions as shown in the argument of this case.