When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

1. On December 12, 2014, the Defendant damaged the repair cost of KRW 788,170,00 for the following reasons: (a) the Defendant: (b) the Defendant occupied the parts of the Funst Sports Vehicle E owned by the Victim E in front of the D main points located in Jeong-si, Jung-si, Sin-si; and (c) the Defendant occupied the parts of the said vehicle, which is the victim’s ownership, and then destroyed the parts of the upper part of the said vehicle to cover up to KRW 78,170.

2. On December 12, 2014, the Defendant, at the same place as indicated in paragraph 1 around December 23:38, 2014, reported to the police the fact of destroying property as indicated in paragraph 1 of this Article by the victim E (22 tax) at the same place as indicated in paragraph 1 of this Article, and assaulted, in his hand, once and once in his/her body, once in his/her body, once in his/her body, once in his/her body, once in his/her flab, and once in his/her flab.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Entry of the witness G and E in the fourth public trial records, and entry of the witness H in the sixth public trial records;

1. Statement made by the police victim to E;

1. Written estimate of general repair expenses;

1. CCTV CDs;

1. Photographs (9) [Attachment] (Around 1, 200, the Defendant merely sleeped a vehicle owned by the victim, and did not damage it as described in the judgment, but only slicked with the victim, and denied the facts charged of this case. However, according to the aforementioned evidence, according to the victim's investigation agency and this court's statements, general repair cost estimates, CCTV CDs, etc., it is recognized that the Defendant destroyed the vehicle owned by the victim by launching the vehicle and assaulted the victim as described in the judgment], the law is applicable.

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of fines for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;