If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

The Defendant is a person using the Internet community “C” in the Internet community B.

피고인은 2018. 8. 1. 05:22경 부산 수영구 D아파트 E호에서 위 사이트 자유게시판에 닉네임 'C‘으로 접속하여, 피해자 F의 닉네임 ’G‘을 상대로 제목에 "G아“를 작성하고 그 내용에 ”H이는 뭔 죄니 ㅉㅉ 애새끼 부모가 새벽에 등신력 풀어바한 모양이지 섹스력 남자에게 푸느라 고행이 많다ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 니 마눌새끼한테 비벼 무능한 씨발롬아“라며 사이트 접속자라면 누구나 볼 수 있는 상태로 피해자의 닉네임을 지칭하여 게시글을 작성하였다.

Accordingly, the Defendant publicly insultingd the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to F and I;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report on investigation (Submission of a written statement of witness who is accused);

1. Relevant Article 311 of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense and Article 311 of the Selection of Punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. In light of the reasoning for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the Defendant had been punished twice for the same kind of crime, and other criminal records of the Defendant, the content and degree of the insult of this case, etc., the summary order cannot be deemed to have been imposed. Therefore, the sentence is determined as per Disposition.