1. The Defendant against the victim B, along with C (Suspension of Prosecution on the same day) on December 1, 2013, did not receive down payment and operating funds in the mutual influent restaurant in Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and the victim B with C, in order to operate studio-suling in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D.

The studio lives that would be repaid within two months in one month by lending KRW 30 million. The studio lives in one month.

However, the facts did not intend to operate studal harassment from the beginning, but tried to use money borrowed from the injured party for the purpose of living expenses, etc., and there was no intention or ability to repay the money even if it borrowed money from the injured party with no particular income or property.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, in collusion with the above C, by deceiving the victim as above, and by deceiving the victim, he received 30 million won from the Saemaul Treasury account (G) in the name of F that was designated by the Defendant around December 3, 2013 from the victim, and acquired it by deceiving the victim.

2. On January 13, 2014, the Defendant’s fraud against the Victim H, along with the above C, is urgently needed at the Defendant’s office in the front-gu office of the Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government I apartment complex, and the Victim H “on the basis of living expenses.”

A false statement was made as follows: (a) one month after the loan of KRW 15 million; (b) one month after the loan of KRW 15 million; and (c) one shall be entrusted as a collateral after the lease of a vehicle under C’s name.

However, from August 2013, the fact was that from around 2013, the amount equivalent to approximately KRW 9.80,000 per month rent was not paid to the lease company of the above AD D AD, and not only was demanded by the above lease company, but also had no intent to deliver the above AD to secure the borrowed money to the victim, and there was no intention or ability to repay the borrowed money due to the relationship with no particular income or property.

Nevertheless, the defendant, in collusion with the above C, makes a false statement to the victim, thereby deceiving the victim.