주주권확인
1. The instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. We examine, ex officio, whether the instant lawsuit is lawful or not, ex officio, as to the determination on the legitimacy of the instant lawsuit.
The Plaintiff asserted that the Defendant is a shareholder on the register of shareholders, but the actual shareholder is the Plaintiff, and sought confirmation of the shares of this case as a shareholder.
However, in a lawsuit for confirmation of confirmation, there must be a benefit of confirmation as a requirement for protection of rights, and the benefit of confirmation is recognized only when it is the most effective means to obtain a judgment against the defendant to eliminate the danger, in danger, and in danger and danger of the plaintiff's rights or legal status.
In addition, according to each of the evidence Nos. 1 and 3, the defendant in a lawsuit for confirmation may recognize the fact that the plaintiff is the representative director of C, the issuing company of the shares of this case, and the defendant submitted a written response to the purport that there is no objection against the plaintiff's claim in relation to the plaintiff's complaint of this case. According to the plaintiff's argument, the plaintiff was transferred the shares of this case to the defendant after title trust to the defendant, and the plaintiff did not alter the shareholder's list of this case, and the plaintiff did not exercise the shareholder's rights of this case.