폭행
All prosecutions against the Defendants are dismissed.
1. The summary of the facts charged is that Defendant A and Defendant B came to know due to the agency driving relationship. A. Defendant A met Defendant B, who received a substitute driving call before the “D club” door located in Dongbcheon-si, Gyeonggi-do, with around 00:20 to 00:30 on March 17, 2018.
피고인은 피고인 B이 "D 클럽" 으로 들어오면서 발로 종아리를 찼다는 이유로 피고인 B의 멱살을 잡고 "D 클럽" 밖으로 나왔다.
In addition, “the same spawn” was expressed as “the same spawn,” and assaulted Defendant B with 7 to 8 times spawn by flabing, pushing, and spawn.
B. Defendant B committed assault against Defendant A, as seen above, such as “W clubs”, “Fresh the same spawn, back spawn, spawn,” and freging the fresh and double-fresh, etc.
2. Each of the above facts charged is a crime falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent pursuant to Article 260(3) of the same Act. On November 13, 2018, the date of the indictment of the instant case, the Defendants appeared in this court, the victim A did not want to be punished by Defendant B, and the victim B made a statement that he/she would not want to be punished by Defendant A. As such, all of the prosecutions against the Defendants are dismissed pursuant to Article 327(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.