마약류관리에관한법률위반(향정)등
Defendant
A Imprisonment for one year, and each of the defendants B and C shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.
Defendant
A 7.5 million won from A,
Punishment of the crime
The Defendants, who are foreigners of Thailand’s nationality, dealt with psychotropic drugs-related psychotropic drugs-related clickphones (one clickphones; hereinafter “clickphones”), as follows, even though they are not authorized to handle them:
1. The Defendants jointly committed the crimes of Defendants B and C, who jointly purchased gatephones (the synthetics of penphonephones and carphones) from their living together, and were able to administer them together.
On April 5, 2019, the Defendants jointly purchased 20,000 won from Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, and 300,000 won to A, and 5 hours from that.
As a result, the Defendants conspired to purchase baba in collusion.
B. At around 18:00 on April 6, 2019, the Defendants, at the house of the Defendants in Daegu-gun E building, and at the house of the Defendants in F, sent the 1st century above the string site, and opened the string as soon as possible, and administered the 5th administration in a way of Gama.
As a result, the Defendants conspired to administer baba in collusion.
2. Defendant A
A. On March 22, 2019, the Defendant purchased YY at the office of the second floor G, H and I at the office of the Defendant in Daegu-gun, Daegu-gun, at the rate of KRW 7.5 million, and purchased YY at the rate of KRW 7.5 million from them.
B. At around 19:00 on April 5, 2019, the Defendant administered amba in a way that makes it possible for the Defendant to ambac to ambac to go on the home of the above Defendant, and to go further, as soon as the ambac to go further due to the heating of ambacs in a single-use log.
(c) Any foreigner violating the Immigration Control Act may stay in the Republic of Korea within the scope of sojourn status and sojourn period.
On March 15, 2016, the Defendant entered the Republic of Korea as the status of visa exemption for 90 days of sojourn and stayed in Daegu large-scale large-scale large-scale large-scale large-scale on June 13, 2016, despite the expiration of the period of sojourn on April 7, 2019, and stayed in the Republic of Korea beyond the scope of the period of sojourn.
3. Defendant B is eligible for status of stay.