2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. The Plaintiff is operating a main office with the trade name “C” on the Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government building B and the eightth floor (hereinafter “instant business”).

B. On December 28, 2017, the Plaintiff rendered a disposition of the suspension of business for two months (from January 22, 2018 to March 21, 2018) pursuant to Articles 75 and 44 of the Food Sanitation Act (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

【Ground of recognition】 The fact that there has been no dispute, Gap evidence 1-1, Eul evidence 5, the purport of the whole entries and arguments

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

가. 원고의 주장 1) 법리오해 주장 가) 식품위생법 시행규칙 제57조 [별표 17] 제7호 다목은 식품접객업자의 준수사항으로서 업소 내에서 도박이나 그밖의 사행행위를 조장하거나 묵인해서는 안된다는 취지로 규정하고 있는데, 원고가 이 사건 업소에서 손님들에게 제공한 칩은 게임의 기회를 제공할 뿐이므로 재물이라고 볼 수 없고, 칩 자체로 아무런 경제적 가치(일반적 환가성)이 없으므로 이 사건 업소에서 칩을 이용하여 블랙잭 등 게임이 이루어졌다고 하여 도박이나 사행행위가 이루어졌다고 볼 수 없다.

B) “Gambling or other speculative acts”, which may be subject to an administrative disposition pursuant to the provisions related to the Food Sanitation Act, should reach the level of punishment under the Criminal Act or other Acts and subordinate statutes, and should be excluded from the act that has not been punished merely due to temporary entertainment. (2) According to the Plaintiff’s assertion of abuse of discretionary power, it is difficult to deem the disposition of this case as impairing the sound people’s lives or sound labor awareness by inducing speculative spirit. In light of the contents of the Plaintiff’s business act, it can be anticipated that the disposition of this case may cause serious economic losses, such as the employee’s salary, rent, etc. of the instant business establishment.