A. Defendant (1) was unaware of the fact that the instant game water was different from the content of the game water management committee’s rating.

Nevertheless, the court below found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case. The court below erred by misunderstanding the facts and affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

(2) The sentence of the lower court (6 months of imprisonment, 2 years of suspended execution, 2 years of forfeiture) that is unfair is too unreasonable.

B. The Prosecutor’s sentence of the lower court is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The lower court also asserted that the Defendant’s assertion of mistake of facts was identical to the grounds for appeal on this part, and the lower court rejected the Defendant’s assertion in detail, stating in its written judgment the Defendant’s assertion and its decision.

In the lower court’s reasoning based on the evidence duly adopted and examined, the following circumstances are acknowledged based on the evidence. ① The Defendant requested that the game machine production company make 10,000 won and less than 50,000 won more than 10,000 won more than 10,000 won more than 50,000 won more than 10,000 won more than 10,000 won more than 20,000 won more than 10,000 won more than 20,000 won more than 20,000 won more than 20,0000 won more than 20,000 won more than 20,000 won more than 20,000 won more than 20,000 won more than 20,000 won more than 20,000 won more than 20,000 won more than 20,000 won.)

Therefore, the defendant's mistake is erroneous.