If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

On June 11, 2013, the Defendant received two copies of the household check in the name of D as follows: “A victim D who requested a discount of two copies of the household check in an amount equivalent to KRW 3 million at the C office located in Yangju-si to pay a discount of KRW 3 million at an interest rate of 3% until July 2013, 2013,” and collected two copies of the household check in the name of D on a discount basis on June 17, 2013, and four copies of the household check on a discount basis on a discount basis on July 4, 2013, on three occasions, including a delivery of eight copies of the household check in an amount equivalent to KRW 24 million at an interest rate.

However, since the economic situation is difficult, the defendant was only liable, and there was no intention or ability to pay the discounted amount of household checks to the victim.

After all, the defendant, by deceiving the victim, acquired a total of KRW 18 million property benefit.

Summary of Evidence

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Relevant Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;