If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

The Defendant was not able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to see the following issues:

At around 19:00 on December 10, 2013, the Defendant brought an injury to the victim, i.e., the victim before the victim’s house located in Pyeongtaek-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, in which he was able to talk with the victim, such as “Yari, Yari, Yawa, Yawa, Ya Ya Ya Y, Lado Y Lado, Lado Do.” In doing so, the Defendant brought an injury to the victim, i.e., the victim’s body was pushed down with the victim’s body and the victim’s chest was fabbed

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness C and E;

1. Examination protocol of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Each police statement of C and E;

1. An investigation report (verification related to C Medical Records of Suspect C and Certificates);

1. An investigation report (to hear statements made by suspects C related to the injury diagnosis);

1. Each injury medical certificate (the fourth, seventeen pages of evidence records);

1. In light of the fact that each statement made by the victim C in an investigative agency and this court is specific and consistent, and that the defendant, who is the plaintiff, was snicker, and made a statement unfavorable to himself in this court during the instant process, each statement made by the victim in the investigative agency and this court has credibility. In addition, even if the victim had been engaged in snicking operations after the instant case, it is deemed that the victim had been conducting snicking operations for a day to the extent that he was aware of the fact that snick snick snick sn sn sn sn sn sn sn sn sn

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of penalties;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The sentencing reason of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order does not recognize the defendant's mistake, and the victim's injury is not less than that of the victim, however, the victim is also the defendant.