Based on its stated reasoning, the lower court reversed the first instance judgment convicting the facts charged of this case and sentenced the Defendant not guilty on the grounds that there was no proof of the facts charged.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the record, the lower court did not err by violating logical and empirical rules and exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence regarding the determination of probative value, as alleged in the grounds of appeal.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.