사해행위취소
1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
Purport of claim and appeal
1..
1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as follows: "each description" of the judgment of the court of first instance 3 20 pages 20; "No. 5 and No. 7" of the court of first instance added "No. 5, 7" to "No. 5, 7 and "No. 7"; "No. 5, 7" of the 4th 18th 18th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7
2. Parts to be dried;
D. 1) As long as the instant donation contract constitutes a fraudulent act, barring any special circumstance, the Defendant, the beneficiary, is presumed to have been aware of the fraudulent act against the creditor, and the Defendant asserts that he/she was a bona fide beneficiary for the following reasons. B, while working as the representative director of I, had been jointly and severally guaranteed the debt of loans to the Pakistan Savings Bank, Co., Ltd., Ltd. for the following reasons. On July 31, 2008, he/she received a letter from J, the resignation of the representative director and then changed to the former representative director, and thus, his/her joint and several debt liability is no longer nonexistent. Accordingly, the Defendant, who was married with B on May 15, 2010, was presumed to have been aware of such debt to B, and the Defendant could not be recognized as having received the aforementioned debt from the representative director at the time of signing the instant transfer on January 20, 2014, and each of the aforementioned statements and evidence Nos. 25 and evidence No. 26 of his/her resignation were not known. 25.
However, the judgment of Gap No. 3 and its contents.