except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant, who entered and stays in the Republic of Korea as a short-term visiting visa (C-3) and obtained a national technical qualification certificate and changed the status of stay to an overseas Korean visa (F-4), was allowed to extend the period of stay in Korea. The defendant, entrusted by the Human Resources Development Service of Korea, obtained a national technical qualification witness information processing technician to be implemented and issued by the Korea Technical Qualification Examination Agency.

However, the Defendant, while making a decision on the examination in the Korean language due to a lack of ability to solve the problem in the examination, was willing to apply for the examination in an unlawful manner by agreement 1.8 million won when he/she passes the examination after being introduced Bracker B in lieu of the examination problem.

1. At around 20:00 on September 17, 2014, the Defendant applied for a written examination of qualification as a full-time technician at the Seoul standing examination site in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, 279, 16 times a full-time engineer at 2014, and entered the answer that the Defendant was unsatisfed through a saton radio wheelphone, which was pre-expled from the above B.

In collusion with the above B, the defendant applied for the examination by the above improper means and obstructed the execution of duties related to the fair management of the examination conducted by the Human Resources Development Service of Korea through fraudulent means

2. On December 13, 2014, around 09:30, the Defendant applied for a practical skill examination of 44-time professional information processing technicians at the 24-o Special Metropolitan City Gwangjin-ro 1, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu 2014, and entered the answer that the Defendant was unsatisfed through the satisfic radio earphones pre-expled from the above B.

In collusion with the above B, the defendant applied for the examination by the above improper means and obstructed the execution of duties related to the fair management of the examination conducted by the Human Resources Development Service of Korea through fraudulent means

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Responses to requests for investigation cooperation (requesting whether to apply for the qualifying examination);

1. A.