beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 2013.09.13 2013고단4224

업무방해등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months and a fine for 600,000 won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, it shall be gold.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. From around 00:20 on August 3, 2013 to 01:40 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) sent a newspaper to the front floor of the Kashter on the ground of the victim’s e-mail, in the E-mail, the Defendant: (b) from around 00:20 to around 01:40 on the same day, the Defendant: (c) took a bath at a large interest of the following: (d) the Defendant: (a) the Defendant: (a) the Defendant: (a) the Defendant: (a) the Defendant: (a) the Defendant: (a) the Defendant: (b) the Defendant: (a) the Defendant: (b) had the customers who had come to the place of the rash; and (b) the Defendant interfered with the Defendant’s sales of the goods by force for about one hour and twenty (20) minutes;

2. The Defendant violated the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act, from around 01:45 to 02:00 on the same day, was arrested and detained as a flagrant offender for the said reason in the Fabag-dong Police Station, which is a government office located in Yongsan-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Gadong Police Station, for the foregoing reason, and was under the influence of alcohol, and, while under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant toldly and fashed by very rough words and actions for about 15 minutes, such as “Wag faw faw w w w w w w w w kk

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Application of the video CD-related Acts and subordinate statutes and on-site photographs;

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 3 (3) 1 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act, applicable to the crimes;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37 and Article 38 (1) 2 and 3 of the Criminal Act and Article 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. In light of the fact that the defendant for the reason of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order was sentenced to a suspended sentence and probation disposition for a crime almost similar to that of the defendant, and that the defendant committed the crime of this case within the period of the suspended sentence, and even before that, the sentence has been

However, it is necessary to consider the punishment to be executed in the event that the obstruction of business of this case was completed once, the victim was not punished, or the suspension of execution is invalidated.