해고무효확인 등
1. The judgment of the court of first instance against the defendant exceeding the following monetary payment order.
1. The Plaintiff entered the Defendant around March 7, 1996 and worked as the Defendant’s second team chairman of the two teams for ship production and the chairman of the two groups, and requested the procuring department to purchase the materials and tools requested by the procuring department, and supplied the materials and tools purchased by the procuring department, the Plaintiff engaged in the business of inspecting and verifying them.
Before February 2013, D, who had worked as the business head of C (hereinafter referred to as “C”), who supplied material and tools to the Defendant, sent a post notice to the effect that “The Plaintiff and C’s representative director E conspired with the Defendant to make payment by forging documents as if they were supplied with the Defendant, and then divided the price.”
Accordingly, the defendant's ethical team signed a confirmation of the fact that the plaintiff and E are responsible for their responsibilities (hereinafter "the person of this case") around March 2013 based on this information to the plaintiff and E on the basis of this information.
The amount recognized by the Plaintiff in the instant case is KRW 167,981,00,00 in Switzerland 654EA 74,621,00, and KRW 416EA 93,360,000 in chloroping fla, and the amount recognized by E is KRW 724EA 82,601,00 in Switzerland and KRW 516,10,000 in Switzerland 516,10,000 in total.
On April 17, 2013, the Defendant held a personnel committee as follows. On April 23, 2013, the Defendant issued a notice of dismissal of the Plaintiff as of April 24, 2013 (hereinafter “instant dismissal”) on the ground that “the supply rate of group 2 materials” was the grounds for disciplinary action.
4. Content of Deliberation: Violation of the Private Rule (Relation to the Supply Cost of Group 2 Materials) - From January 2010 to February 2013, C (Representative E) in collusion with the Plaintiff, which is the Director 2 Group B of the Ship Production 2 Team, did not supply indirect expendable materials over 31 occasions and received the cost of the materials unfairly. C shall confirm the supply by the Plaintiff after entering the empty lane company.