A. 1) The Plaintiff A is a student who entered the FF high school located in both weeks in 2014.

2) Plaintiffs B and C are the parents of Plaintiff A, and Plaintiff D are the students of Plaintiff A, and the Defendant is a corporation established under the Act on the Prevention of and Compensation for Accidents at School (hereinafter “School Safety Act”), which is a mutual aid business entity for school safety, to which the head of F high school was enrolled.

B. On December 18, 2014, when the plaintiff A was in the first grade of F High School, he was in school as a member of the Taekwondo department of the above school, and was in school as a member of the Teaching Party (gymnasium) and was in school as a member of the Taekwondo department, and was in school as a member of the Taekwondo department, and was knenee on the left-hand side, and was in the accident of this case (hereinafter referred to as "Ra"), he was in the top-hand slelele of the lower-hand slelelele of the slekele of the left-hand slelelelele of the sleak and the first half of the internal side. The plaintiff A was in the process of rehabilitation treatment without undergoing the operation after the accident of this case, and was in the process of the above medical treatment, and was in the process of removal of the sleak sleak sleaking and the sleaking sleaking alcohol on March 3, 2016

(c)

1) Afterwardly, the Plaintiffs filed the instant lawsuit against the Defendant seeking disability benefits under the School Safety Act, claiming that there exists a subsequent disability to the Plaintiff A.

2) This Court entrusted G Hospital with the physical appraisal of Plaintiff A, and the content of the result is as follows.

- As a result of the examination on the part of the Plaintiff’s accident, he observed that he was fluored in the pre-defluence of both sides of the sloping radiation photo (9.1m on the left side and 8.2m on the left side) on each side of the slive radiation photo, and it is difficult to compare the pre-fluort dynamics in the state of drinking in the state of drinking after the slurbing of the upper right slurg at the time of the appraisal, and it is difficult to compare the slurgy with the dry side.

- In the case of Plaintiff A’s left-hand slot, there is no evidence of contribution to the instant accident, and the degree of contribution to the instant accident is 100%, and the treatment seems to be terminated.