A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for eight months and by imprisonment for six months.

However, the Defendants are subject to this.

1. Defendant A

A. At around 00:50 on March 23, 2014, the Defendant, along with Defendant B, abused alcohol at E-cafeteria located in the window of Changwon-si, on the ground that he was fluord with the victim F (26 years of age) while drinking alcohol at the E-cafeteria, the Defendant breaddd the victim’s face one time by hand, and assaulted the victims by having the victim G (25 years of age)’s face at the right end.

B. On March 23, 2014, the Defendant committed assault, such as: (a) around 01:20, the Defendant committed an act of obstructing performance of official duties, and (b) the Defendant committed an assault, such as: (c) the defect that the Defendant, who was the Defendant B, told that the Defendant attached a vehicle as set forth in the following 2-B; (d) the police officer, who was a police officer of the H Zone called up upon receiving a report, attempted to arrest the Defendant B as an offender in the act of destroying property;

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of official duties concerning the prevention, suppression and investigation of police officers' crimes.

2. Defendant B

A. The Defendant, along with the Defendant A at the time and place specified in the above-mentioned 1-A (25 years of age), went out of the restaurant by making time as indicated in the Victim G (25 years of age) with the victim G, and continued to engage in a verbal dispute with the victim, and assaulted the victim at one time to the right sle of the victim by drinking.

B. The Defendant who caused the damage to property, at the time and place set forth in the above paragraph (a) above, was dissatisfied with G, such as the date and time set in the said paragraph, and at the same time, destroyed the said car to be influent repair costs, such as: (a) the Defendant’s failure to set the full glass for the instant car owned by the victim J, which was parked at the same time, several times as a drinking event; and (b) the Defendant’s flash the front glass for the instant

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Protocol concerning the suspect interrogation of each of the Defendants

1. Application of each police protocol of statement to F, G, J, and I;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act; Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (a point of view of violence); Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act; Article 260(1) (a) of the Criminal Act; Article 260(2) of the Criminal Act; Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act;