However, as to the defendants for one year from the date this judgment became final and conclusive, the defendants are above.

1. Defendant A is a person who has completed a marriage report with D on January 5, 2001.

On July 201, 201, the Defendant: (a) sent B and once sexual intercourse at the home of Japan, Yasi E 1002, and (b) sent B and one time sexual intercourse at the apartment located in Japan, on August 14, 2011; and (c) sent B and one time sexual intercourse at the home of Japan, which was around October 201, 201, from the first policeman’s house to the B and three times.

2. Defendant B knew that he was a spouse, and even at the same time and place as that of paragraph (1), the Defendant had sexual intercourses over three times with A, as set forth in paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Written statements of D;

1. A written additional complaint;

1. Application of the provisions of the Acts and subordinate statutes concerning the documents received by the Director of Divorce, evidence photographs and Kax;

1. Defendant A of the pertinent Article of the Criminal Act concerning the crime: The first sentence of Article 241(1) of the Criminal Act: The second sentence of Article 241(1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants from among concurrent crimes: the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act; and

1. Defendants on probation: Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act