2. The fact that the defendant had no criminal records exceeding the same criminal records and fine is favorable to the defendant, or that the employment of a foreigner in illegal stay in Korea would disrupt the immigration control order and create potential criminal causes, and the punishment is inevitable. In light of the employment period of the foreigner employed by the defendant, the crime's age, sex, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and other various sentencing conditions stipulated in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, including the defendant's age, sex, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and other various sentencing conditions stipulated in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, unlike the circumstances before and after the crime, the court below exceeded the reasonable limit of discretion in sentencing determination.

In full view of the circumstances to be assessed or the fact that there is no new material that was presented in the course of the trial of sentencing on the political party (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2015Do3260, Jul. 23, 2015), etc., the lower court’s sentence against the Defendant is unreasonable because the sentence of the lower court was inappropriate, and thus, the Defendant’s argument of sentencing is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.