2. In addition, the Defendant committed each of the larceny crimes of this case even though he was punished several times due to the same criminal records, and was punished by a fine for negligence in 2017 after he committed the larceny during the period of repeated crime due to the larceny.

However, on July 2017, the victim of the bicycle theft crime of this case stated that the victim does not want the punishment of the defendant, and on October 25, 2017, the victim of the crime also stated at an investigative agency that he does not want punishment if the defendant's reflects the truth.

In addition, when comprehensively considering the sentencing conditions indicated in the records, such as the defendant's age, sex, environment, background of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, the sentence of the court below is too unobsessed and it is not deemed unfair.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.