보상금증액청구의 소
1. The Defendant: 102,480,530 won to Plaintiff A; 31,744,880 won to Plaintiff B; 11,831,405 won to Plaintiff C and D; and the Plaintiff.
1. Details of ruling;
(a) Business approval and public notice - Business name: I Housing Redevelopment and rearrangement project (hereinafter referred to as the “instant project”): Defendant - Business approval: Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government public notice on September 16, 2010;
B. L Committee’s ruling on expropriation on June 24, 2016 - The object of expropriation is as described in each item of “subject matter of confinement” listed in attached Table 1.
(hereinafter “Subject matter of this case” refers to “subject matter of this case’s expropriation. In addition, when each land owned by the Plaintiffs is individually referred, it is to be specified only by Dong and lot number in the manner of indicating “Seoul Yeongdeungpo-gu M& 434.7 square meters” as “M land” as indicated by the Plaintiff’s “M land.” [In addition, each obstacle owned by the Plaintiffs was also adjudicated to expropriate, but the Plaintiffs did not assert any increase in compensation for each obstacle, and accordingly did not file an application for market price assessment accordingly, it is to be examined only on each land owned by the Plaintiffs; hereinafter the same shall apply] - The starting date of expropriation: August 12, 2016 - Compensation for expropriation: Each entry in the item of “compensation for Expropriation” in the
- An appraisal corporation: The LABD, the LABD - The comparison standard place: The above two appraisal corporations shall select the comparison standard place of the object of expropriation in this case as follows.
① As a comparative standard site for M&A’s land and P’s land owned by the Plaintiff, the Seoul Yeongdeungpo-gu Q 243.3 square meters (the main use: the specific use area: the Class-II general use area, the Class-II general use area, the road traffic: the route angle, the shape/land: the sloping) shall be selected. ② The comparison standard site for R, S, and T’s land owned by the Plaintiff (the land use: the main use: the third-class general use area: the third-class general use area, the road traffic: the third-class general use area, the third-class road traffic: the emulation/path: the third-class general use area), the third-class general use area, the third-class general use area, the road traffic: the third general use area, and the third-class general use area.