However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant and the victim C are adjoining neighbors of "2018 Highest 533.

On February 17, 2018, at around 20:0, the Defendant: (a) maintained the entrance door of the victim C (V) located in Seo-gu, Daegu-gu D on the ground that the husband of the victim did not report the victim’s husband E at Schlage; (b) opened the entrance door of the victim with a food knife (35 cm in length) which is a dangerous thing for the victim to find the above E, and opened the entrance door of the victim with the above knife onto the door, and (c) opened the knife in the above knife knife, “the knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knif.”

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and threatened the victim.

The Defendant, on February 17, 2018, 2018, 201:01:30 on February 17, 2018, at the G restaurant operated by the victim E (V, 67 years old) in the Daegu Seo-gu, Daegu, Seo-gu., 2018.

In order to avoid disturbance, an empty beer's disease, which is a dangerous object on the floor of the area, and an empty beer's disease and nine scams' disease, were used to assault the victim.

Summary of Evidence

"2018 Highest 533"

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement protocol against C and E;

1. Records of seizure, lists of seizure and photographs of seized articles;

1. A investigative report (as to the closure of a photograph), " 2018 Highest 814";

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Photographs of criminal tools;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report internal accidents (referring to the statements made by shots H);

1. Articles 284, 283(1) (special intimidation), 261, and 260(1) (special assault) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, and the choice of imprisonment, respectively;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The fact that the reasons for the sentencing of Article 48(1) of the Confiscation Criminal Code are several times, and that the defendant does not immediately appeal and repeat the crime while recognizing and opposing his mistake.