However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant is a person who operates the manufacturing facilities of metal processed products with the trade name of “C” in Si interesting City B.

From October 10, 2012 to December 29, 2014, the Defendant installed and operated facilities for manufacturing metal processed products, which are facilities for discharging specific substances harmful to water quality (Cu, Pb, and Cd) without obtaining permission from the competent authority, and on the other hand, the Defendant failed to operate preventive facilities normally without justifiable grounds, thereby exceeding 3 p.65 p.m. and 35.65 p.m. (Pb) which are the base value for 0.5 p.m. exceeding 4.78 p.m., chemical oxygen demand exceeding 130 p.m. (COD), exceeding 130 p.m., 159.2 p., 1057 p.m., 105 p.m., 60 p.m. (T-N) from 120 p.m. to 150 p.m., 60 p. 9m. (P. 9m. 5m.), and 95m p. 5m p.m. (P) p.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each investigation report (including attached materials);

1. Relevant provisions of the relevant Act on Criminal facts, subparagraph 1 of Article 75, Article 33 (1) of the Act on the Selection of Water Quality and Aquatic Ecosystem Conservation, subparagraph 3 of Article 76, and Article 38 (1) 4 of the Water Quality and Aquatic Ecosystem Conservation Act (in cases where preventive facilities are not operated normally without justifiable grounds), Articles 77 and 15 (1) 1 of the Water Quality and Aquatic Ecosystem Conservation Act (in cases where specific substances harmful to water quality are leaked to public waters), and the decision to punish imprisonment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act to increase concurrent crimes;

1. The fact that the defendant under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act is led to confession and is against himself; and