However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date of the final judgment.

1. 폭행 피고인은 2014. 4. 25. 01:00경 부산 수영구 C에 있는 ‘D’ 주점에서 술을 마시던 중, 술에 취하여 피고인의 옆 탁자에서 술을 마시고 있던 피해자 E(47세)에게 별다른 이유 없이 “야, 내가 칠성파다.”라고 말하며 소지하고 있던 고추를 쪼갠 후 이를 피해자의 왼쪽 눈에 비비거나 피해자를 향하여 주먹을 수회 휘두르는 등의 방법으로 폭행하였다.

2. As such as the act described in paragraph (1), the Defendant expressed to the victim G, the circumstances leading up to the F District of the Busan Southern Police Station, who was dispatched in the future of the said week, for the said case, that “I shall listen to the said E and the many unspecified persons who used the said E and the said materials,” thereby openly insulting the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements concerning E and G;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act, Articles 260 (1) and 311 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor;

1.Article 37 (former part), Articles 38(1)2 and 50 of the Criminal Code among concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (i.e., reflective facts of the suspension of execution);

1. Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on Probation (it is possible to repeat a crime in light of criminal records);