보험금
1. The plaintiff's appeal and the defendant's incidental appeal are all dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal and the incidental costs thereof shall be individually considered.
1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows, except for the rejection of Gap evidence No. 23, which is insufficient to recognize the plaintiff's assertion that a loss of inventory assets occurred in excess of 31,958,624 won as evidence additionally submitted by the court of first instance, and therefore, it is identical to the part concerning the reasons of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, it is acceptable in accordance with Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act
2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim is justified within the above scope of recognition, and the remaining claims are dismissed as it is without merit. The judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal and the defendant's incidental appeal are dismissed as they are without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.