However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On March 3, 2014, the Defendant: (a) taken out the resident registration certificate from the victim D's diving machine, which was suffering from a shelter of the C Hospital located in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu;

L. A. L. theft was committed.

2. When the Defendant was unable to open a mobile phone in his/her name due to the unpaid fees for the mobile phone, he/she had the intention to open a mobile phone in his/her name using the stolen DNA resident registration certificate, as provided in paragraph (1).

On April 10, 2014, at around 14:30, the Defendant entered an application for mobile phone membership, program subscription, and personal information utilization consent column in the mobile phone agent of F, “G” operated by Jincheon-gun, Jincheon-gun, Jincheon-gun, the Defendant signed the “D” on his name.

Accordingly, the defendant set the application form for mobile phone subscription, program subscription, and consent form for the use of personal information in the name of D, a private document on rights and obligations, respectively.

3. At the time and place set forth in paragraph 2, the Defendant exercised the cell phone subscription application, program subscription application, and consent to the use of personal information to F, who is aware of the forgery.

4. The unlawful uttering of official document presented that the defendant's resident registration certificate of D, which was stolen and possessed in the name of the Si of Chungcheongnam-do, Chungcheongnam-do, Chungcheongnam-do, is a resident registration certificate of the defendant, as in paragraph 1, which was demanded by F to present his identification card in order to verify his status at the date and place set forth in paragraph 2.

Accordingly, the defendant did not use official documents.

5. The Defendant, at the time and place set forth in paragraph 2, proposed the above identification card as if the Defendant was D and applied for the opening of a mobile phone in the name of D, by deceiving the victim F, who was an operator of a mobile phone, who was an operator of the mobile phone, and was issued one cell phone from the victim, with a value equivalent to KRW 954,800.