However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. 모욕 피고인은 2014. 5. 16. 22:00경 용인시 처인구 B에 있는 C가 운영하는 ‘D’ 주점에서 술값을 계산하지 않고 행패를 부리다가 신고를 받고 출동한 용인동부경찰서 E지구대 소속 경찰관인 피해자 F과 피해자 G으로부터 제지를 받자, 위 C와 여러 명의 종업원들이 지켜보는 가운데 피해자들에게 “야! 개새끼야, 씨발 놈아, 네가 뭔데 상관이냐 , 꺼져라, 입 닥쳐라, 짭새 씹할 새끼야”라고 소리쳐 공연히 피해자들을 모욕하였다.

2. The Defendant committed assaulting the F and G, at the same time and place of the same performance of official duties, that said F and G “mast,” with the desire to read “mast,” such as “masting a drinking, fluoring the chest part of the said F, etc., several times, and pushed the said F, thereby obstructing the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties concerning the maintenance of public order for about 15 minutes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written statement of C, G, and F;

1. Application of each statute on filing of a complaint;

1. Articles 311, 136 (1) and 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the relevant criminal facts, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Consideration of the fact that it is a contingent crime and the fact that the defendant is against his/her will);