However, the defendant agreed to most of the victims in the court below, and there is a favorable circumstance for the defendant, such as deposit of KRW 400,000 to the victim G in the trial, deposit of KRW 100,00 to the victim F, and recognition of mistake and reflect it.

However, the Defendant committed the instant crime, in collaboration with Co-Defendant A in the lower judgment, stolen approximately KRW 9,867,00,00 in total market value for two months, and committed the instant crime under the same law in six months and three months only after the judgment of suspended execution became final and conclusive on April 11, 2013 due to special larceny and larceny, and taking into account all other circumstances, such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, motive, means and consequence of the instant crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentencing of the lower court is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.