beta
(영문) 춘천지방법원 속초지원 2014.11.26 2013고단240

도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Provided, That the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a B knife vehicle in violation of the Road Traffic Act (not taking measures after accidents) and the Road Traffic Act.

On March 12, 2012, the Defendant driven the said car on March 12, 2012, and driven it along the two-lanes from the right side of the port side to the right side of the wind sub-section from the wind sub-section.

In this case, the defendant engaged in driving service has a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by driving safely, such as driving on the front side and driving along the lane.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and negligently changed the lane as it is, and instead, did not avoid the victim C, which was the victim C, who was standing in the signal atmosphere in front of the course, and received the back part of the above car operated by the Defendant, which was the back part of the right side of the said car, and received the back part of the said car owned by the victim.

Ultimately, the Defendant destroyed the car owned by the victim due to the above occupational negligence so that the 387,530 won of the repair cost is damaged, but failed to immediately stop and take necessary measures, and escaped as it is.

2. On March 12, 2012, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed Driving) driving a B car on the road near the northwest-gu film zone in Suwon-si, Suwon-si from the northwest-gu, Suwon-si, to the shooting distance in the Gyeonggi-si, Young-gu, Kungcheon-dong, Gyeonggi-do, without obtaining a driver’s license within a about 10km section.

3. On March 12, 2012, the Defendant violated the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act: (a) operated a B car without mandatory insurance as owned by the Defendant from the northwest-gu film-dong, Suwon-si to the long-distance from the northwest-gu, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, a motion picture zone; and (b) a B car that was not covered by mandatory insurance.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant;