If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

The Defendant, who operates a D child care center located in the Osan-si C Apartment Complex, was unable to receive a subsidy or use a subsidy by fraud or other improper means. On October 201, the Defendant connected the E-child care administrative system using the aforementioned computer to the E-child care center, which is a standard infant care administrative system, using the aforementioned computer. On October 2011, the Defendant received an application for an exception of KRW 286,000 from July 201 to October 201, even though he/she did not attend the child care center even though he/she was found to have been present at the child care center, and received the basic child care fee for E from July 201 to October 10, 201 by filing an application for an exception of KRW 115,000 from July 201 to October 20.

As a result, the Defendant received a total of KRW 631,00 subsidies by illegal means.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each police interrogation protocol against the accused and F;

1. A written accusation and a written statement of the production of the Osan market;

1. A copy of a request for ex post facto cooperation, such as a copy of the current status of support for childcare fees for the period of stay in overseas, duplicate welfare benefits (child care fees and child care allowances), and confirmation of illegal receipt, and the application of statutes to confirm the payment of child care fees

1. Relevant Article 54 (2) of the Infant Care Act, the choice of punishment, and the choice of fines for criminal facts;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;