beta
(영문) 대전지방법원 홍성지원 2016.01.13 2015고정206

정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반(정보통신망침해등)등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant served as the director of Boan City apartment management office and was dismissed on April 8, 2014.

1. No person who violates the Act on Promotion of Utilization of Information and Communications Network and Protection, etc. of Information and Communications Network (violation, etc. of Information and Communications Network) shall intrude into an information and communications network without legitimate authority

In spite of the absence of any authority to access the apartment management system (E) that is an information and communications network (E) that the victim D Co., Ltd. was dismissed from the office of the head of the management office as above, the defendant entered the ID and password that he/she became aware of while working as the head of the management office of the F apartment No. 315 dong 601, 201 on April 25, 2014, and visited the above site on April 17, 2014.

Accordingly, the defendant violated the victim's information and communication network without legitimate access.

2. No person who has managed personal information in violation of the Personal Information Protection Act shall damage, destroy, alter, forge, or leak any third person's personal information without due authority or beyond permitted authority;

As the above apartment management complaint, the defendant was a personal information manager of CCTV established for the purpose of crime prevention and facility safety management in apartment.

On February 19, 2014, at the office of the above apartment management office around A.M., the Defendant: (a) taken CCTV images on which the body of G or H was taken and stored; and (b) submitted the screen by printing out the screen by printing it out to the Chungcheongnamnam Regional Labor Relations Commission as evidence of the case of the application for remedy against unfair dismissal to the Defendant, around June 18, 2014.

Accordingly, the Defendant leaked personal information of G and H without legitimate authority.

Summary of Evidence

[Judgment No. 1]

1. Partial statement of the defendant;